Evil must be seen for what it is, it has a temporary, inconsistent, illusory nature, it can and must be overcome.
Above all love
A hidden inheritance
- of Francesco Arista and Antonella Molica
Argument
- → The world in which you believe you are living is only an illusion, it does not really exist, forever, it is an ephemeral kingdom, empty, subject to destruction.
- → What is destined for nothing is already nothing, it has the nature of nothingness, it is worth zero.
- → What is eternal has infinite value, and can and must be aware of it.
- → Every man has infinite nature and if he is not aware he suffers enormously.
- → The unconscious is a slave to nothing, wanders into nothing, but only temporarily.
Recurrences in the text
- → Listen to me and you will live with me forever.
- → The process of the nature of things will pass, it is not eternal.
- → Man is eternal, he has eternal being.
- → Becoming is a process of implementation of the divine nature of man.
- → This body is nothing, it is not comparable to the man God.
- → The illusion does not really exist, lasts only a short time and then fades away.
- → Darkness does not exist forever, it is an illusion.
- → Man is eternal and the world is temporary.
- → What belongs to death is temporary in nature.
- → Let go the illusion of the world, of the body and of nothingness out of your mind.
- → Observe the always present truth, by nature still and eternal, even in illusion.
- → Evil must be seen for what it is, it has a temporary, inconsistent, illusory nature, it can and must be overcome.
- → Man can and must understand and choose, but this does not exclude the experience of pain.
- → Every man has infinite nature and if he is not aware he suffers enormously.
- → The eternal nature does not change, the awareness evolves and becomes.
- → Man is destined to realize divinity.
- → The attachment to the temporariness of the things of the world by eternal beings is ridiculous.
- → Every man can and must realize eternity, because he possesses it by nature and can not lose it.
Relative arguments