In every pain there is a particular demand for love on my part.

In every pain there is a particular demand for love on my part.

Language: english / italian / spanish / chinese

Above all love
A hidden inheritance

of Francesco Arista and Antonella Molica

Argument

→ I am all-powerful, unlimited love.
→ My omnipotence includes full knowledge of what happens, what I want and how to get it.
→ My nature desires a full loving relationship with you.
→ I desire you as equals, face to face, I do not want you as servants.

→ Living with God in this world means putting him first, considering him the only reason to live, one's own goal, feeling that one wants only him, living only for him.

→ The path in the world is difficult, but I love you and you can and must overcome it.

→ The difficulties of the world tell you not to stop, to go further, to minimize them, they challenge you to recognize the truth.

→ Those who live these certainties know that they belong to me, to the truth, and not to the world, in an indestructible bond of mutual love.

→ Every man, every son of mine, is destined to solve and overcome the riddle of the world.

→ In every pain there is a particular demand for love on my part.

→ The quality of my love for you is obscured by the world and by what belongs to it, finished, limited and conditioned.

→ If you recognize and contrast the nature of the world, you can understand who you are.

→ I know that it is not easy to be aware in this world, that the matter in which you now find yourself is bound by conditionings that you can now only partially regulate, you cannot exclude.

→ You have nothing in common with this worn and worn-out world, you are by nature like me, but in a potential and unrealized form.

→ As I am above all love and my love has man as its first object, the painful nature of the world is part of my project, it has a positive functional value.

→ Absolute truth is undoubtedly the main truth to consider and love.

→ Explore this path in depth, and don't blame yourself for the difficulties.

→ You can choose me or reject me, but not forever, the truth of your nature will eventually prevail over any illusion

→ The truth is eternal, the illusion is temporary.

→ Without me everything in the world deceives you.

Recurrences in the text

→ My nature desires a full loving relationship with you.
→ Living with God in this world means putting him first, considering him the only reason to live, one's own goal, feeling that one wants only him, living only for him.
→ The path in the world is difficult, but I love you and you can and must overcome it.
→ The difficulties of the world tell you not to stop, to go further, to minimize them, they challenge you to recognize the truth.
→ Those who live these certainties know that they belong to me, to the truth, and not to the world, in an indestructible bond of mutual love.
→ Every man, every son of mine, is destined to solve and overcome the riddle of the world.
→ In every pain there is a particular demand for love on my part.
→ The quality of my love for you is obscured by the world and by what belongs to it, finished, limited and conditioned.
→ If you recognize and contrast the nature of the world, you can understand who you are.
→ I know that it is not easy to be aware in this world, that the matter in which you now find yourself is bound by conditionings that you can now only partially regulate, you cannot exclude.
→ You have nothing in common with this worn and worn-out world, you are by nature like me, but in a potential and unrealized form.
→ As I am above all love and my love has man as its first object, the painful nature of the world is part of my project, it has a positive functional value.
→ Absolute truth is undoubtedly the main truth to consider and love.
→ Explore this path in depth, and don't blame yourself for the difficulties.
→ You can choose me or reject me, but not forever, the truth of your nature will eventually prevail over any illusion
→ The truth is eternal, the illusion is temporary.
→ Without me everything in the world deceives you.

Relative arguments