I am the Lord who speaks with that love, which understood in all his entirety and completeness realize my purpose and aim.
Above all love
A hidden inheritance
- of Francesco Arista and Antonella Molica
Argument
- → Nervous, habitual, profound emotional inconstancy is painful, lacking in self-confidence and in one's own purposes, but it can always evolve in the search and in the pursuit of a better state.
- → If you try to adapt to what is happening by considering it true or valid, you end up being a victim, an incapable, a weak, at the mercy of anyone, fragmented, other than yourself.
- → The world is by nature fragile, temporary, constantly trying to delude and disappoint you, to convince you that you have its nature, that you are fragile, temporary, and you belong to it.
- → The temporariness, fragility, pain and contradiction of being in the world are unacceptable to the divine nature of man.
- → The knowledge of the contrast between my omnipotent and loving nature, and the enormous malignancy of the cosmos, shows you what I have given you from the beginning, my nature.
- → The enormous difficulty that man has to solve is appropriate to his divine potential.
- → The contrast between you and the world, the pain that the world imposes on you, is the stimulus to go beyond.
- → If I, God, love you and allow you to face such a difficulty, my correctness implies that you are immense, divine, similar to me.
- → Your experience of my opposite offers you the possibility to choose me with a love similar to mine, because you are similar to me, divine.
- → The truth cannot be defeated, for I am the almighty, the eternal, and I love you as my neighbor, son, similar to me, as myself.
- → Only the certainty of eternal truth and his bond to it can enable man to overcome the burden of the world.
- → Everything is in my hands, and I rule for your utmost good, in view of my plan of eternal love for you.
- → Observe your brothers with my love, as eternal souls, at worst lost in the world, not as bodies, distinguish the eternal and the insubstantial.
Relative arguments