The world can not do anything to you, it can not destroy this love between you and me, it can distort and deform only the reality that belongs to it.
Above all love A hidden inheritance
of Francesco Arista and Antonella Molica Argument
→ If he refuses what he is , man loses himself , he cedes beeing to things , to nothingness , and suffers .→ In rejecting love , you lose your realization , you suffer and you make others suffer .→ Every man can and must realize eternity , because he possesses it by nature and can not lose it.→ If you fear or crave the world , you can not observe it, you lose sight of the truth , you and me, you can not love me.
→ In the divine plan of the development of love , pain is a considerable component which tends to activate the search for its overcoming , the necessity of awakening .→ If you consider what you want in the world to be true or primary , if you try to control and condition what happens , you end up suffering a lot , because you cannot control the world .→ Let the world go its own way , towards nothingness , according to its destiny , not to waste time and energy in trying to conquer it, possess it, save it or enjoy it more than much .→ In this world , material logic imposes itself on man before he is able to defend himself , but it is subjected to destruction , and this painful bond pushes man to seek beyond .
→ This emptiness , this absence of substance , of reason , of heart , makes you slaves , prisoners of an empty world , which makes you believe you are deficient , exploits your deficiencies , makes you do what it wants .→ Get rid of what the world and the flesh make you believe .→ Do not believe the judgments of the world or those who identify with the world .→ If you do not remember me, the world invades your conscience , conditions you, robs you of your transcendent nature , possesses you, makes you believe that you are similar , mortal , fragile .→ This world says that everything is temporary .→ The voice of the world denies me completely or simulates being me.
Relative arguments