God is above all love and you are love.

God is above all love and you are love.

Language: english / italian / spanish / chinese

Above all love
A hidden inheritance

of Francesco Arista and Antonella Molica

Argument

→ You belong to me and I belong to you.

→ God is above all love and you are love.

→ God is truth and you are.

→ God wants children who choose to be like him, absolutely divine.

→ The contradictions and problems of the world find no solution within it.

→ If you can understand this, even in relation to you every temporary phenomenon is worth zero, you too is absolute, eternal, infinite.

→ You and I are eternal.

→ I'm your father, the father who never leaves you alone, don't be sad, rejoice with me.

→ I am the son who never leaves his father alone, I am not sad, I rejoice with you, father.

→ I'm your father, call me father or dad.
→ I'm your son, call me son.
→ That's the beauty of the encounter between father and son.

→ My loving nature, my being love, pushes me to create, to a becoming of love.

→ Freedom requires a choice, so you must have different possibilities to be able to choose me, so I also created my opposite so that you could choose me.

→ My uniqueness and the dimension of my love, of my choice, need a very efficient opposite of mine to allow a meaningful choice of yours, appropriate to mine.

Recurrences in the text

→ You belong to me and I belong to you.
→ God is above all love and you are love.
→ God is truth and you are.
→ God wants children who choose to be like him, absolutely divine.
→ The contradictions and problems of the world find no solution within it.
→ If you can understand this, even in relation to you every temporary phenomenon is worth zero, you too is absolute, eternal, infinite.
→ You and I are eternal.
→ I'm your father, the father who never leaves you alone, don't be sad, rejoice with me.
→ I am the son who never leaves his father alone, I am not sad, I rejoice with you, father.
→ I'm your father, call me father or dad.
→ My loving nature, my being love, pushes me to create, to a becoming of love.
→ Freedom requires a choice, so you must have different possibilities to be able to choose me, so I also created my opposite so that you could choose me.
→ My uniqueness and the dimension of my love, of my choice, need a very efficient opposite of mine to allow a meaningful choice of yours, appropriate to mine.

Relative arguments