I can love you everywhere, but love is uncertain in bodies, in sensations, in what is temporary, it is certain in what is eternal.
Above all love
A hidden inheritance
- of Francesco Arista and Antonella Molica
Argument
Recurrences in the text
- → If no logic made sense, there would be no sense, no truth and no knowledge.
- → Not believing in the existence of truth means not believing in anything, believing in pure nothingness, in total absurdity.
- → The phrase "No logic makes sense" falsifies itself, is absurd, negative self-referential, therefore there exists a valid logic.
- → A negative self-referential phrase contradicts itself, is false, absurd, a logical trap, certifies its negation and tries to deny the absolute.
- → The opposites of negative self-referential phrases are true in an absolute, unconditional way.
- → Be certain that an eternally true reality exists and belongs to you.
- → If the mind generalizes the voice of the world, it says that everything is temporary.
- → To believe it is necessary to believe that there is truth, a reality that is always true, eternal.
- → Without me, you lose yourself, the world drags you into its illusion, it robs you of the truth, of your eternal identity.
- → I love you and I want you, as you already know, and I will undoubtedly have you.
- → Infinite love is also in bodies, but certainly beyond bodies, even in sensations, but certainly beyond sensations, even in temporariness, but certainly beyond temporariness.
- → I can love you everywhere, but love is uncertain in bodies, in sensations, in what is temporary, it is certain in what is eternal.
- → Certain love is eternal and there I am fully.
- → If you believe in me, in our bond, in indestructibility, you cannot take into account or worry about what is ephemeral.
- → The trial that now touches the world is for the benefit of all of you, my children, it shows you the ephemeral nature of things in the world and draws your attention to me, your eternal need for love and certainty.
Relative arguments