Man needs love, he was created for love, he is love in every part, he must recognize what he has inside, he must know who he is, who I am, he can realize the truth by detaching himself from the world, from empty things , vain, illusory, which do not give love, which give only an apparent, fragile love which tends to destroy and destroy itself.
Above all love A hidden inheritance
of Francesco Arista and Antonella Molica Argument
→ My children get involved in a pitiful , useless world , that seduces and then destroys them.→ Yet you let yourselves be involved in a world built on null, empty elements , in which there is nothing , absolutely nothing .→ Do not be fooled by the world , because in that state you can not be happy , in joy , because the world seduces and destroys .→ I will not leave you alone .→ If you love me, you can give me the center of your attention , put me first in you and leave material things in the background .
→ Man needs love , he was created for love , he is love in every part , he must recognize what he has inside, he must know who he is , who I am , he can realize the truth by detaching himself from the world , from empty things , vain , illusory , which do not give love , which give only an apparent , fragile love which tends to destroy and destroy itself .
→ The conditionings of materiality are very strong , unbeatable on its plane .→ If you do not remember me, the world invades your conscience , conditions you, robs you of your transcendent nature , possesses you, makes you believe that you are similar , mortal , fragile .→ If you consider what you want in the world to be true or primary , if you try to control and condition what happens , you end up suffering a lot , because you cannot control the world .→ Access to the truth in your condition is neither easy nor impossible and costs a great deal of effort .→ The experience of the world is an illusion , it conditions you continuously , with an enormous amount of false information since your childhood , since you could not recognize it.
Relative arguments