Language: english / italian / spanish / chinese

Above all love
A hidden inheritance

of Francesco Arista and Antonella Molica

Argument

build

→ What is destined for nothing is already nothing, it has the nature of nothingness, it is worth zero.
→ The certainty that you find in me contrasts with the uncertainty that the world has by nature and gives you.
→ For the immortal nature, evil is a temporary illusion.
→ Your deepest and truest nature is unconditional.
→ What you are has nothing in common with the temporary nature of the world.

→ What is eternal has infinite value, and can and must be aware of it.

→ Every man has infinite nature and if he is not aware he suffers enormously.

→ The eternal nature does not change, the awareness evolves and becomes.

→ Your deepest and truest nature is unconditional.

→ The nature of experience is ambiguous if it does not refer to what surpasses it.

→ The material world is by nature fragmentary, hostile to knowledge.

→ This temporary world has an opposite nature to mine, it's my opposite.

→ Your nature is your destiny, nothing dark belongs to you.

→ The world is an instrument, a means that does not know and does not have its own end.

→ What belongs to the world has the nature of the world, it finds meaning only in being used in view of what surpasses it.

→ Man does not have the nature of the world; in being used for other purposes he undergoes a forcing.

→ The end of man belongs to him, it is his very nature and it surpasses this world.

Recurrences in the text

→ What is destined for nothing is already nothing, it has the nature of nothingness, it is worth zero.
→ What is eternal has infinite value, and can and must be aware of it.
→ Every man has infinite nature and if he is not aware he suffers enormously.
→ The eternal nature does not change, the awareness evolves and becomes.
→ Your deepest and truest nature is unconditional.
→ The nature of experience is ambiguous if it does not refer to what surpasses it.
→ The material world is by nature fragmentary, hostile to knowledge.
→ This temporary world has an opposite nature to mine, it's my opposite.
→ Your nature is your destiny, nothing dark belongs to you.
→ The world is an instrument, a means that does not know and does not have its own end.
→ What belongs to the world has the nature of the world, it finds meaning only in being used in view of what surpasses it.
→ Man does not have the nature of the world; in being used for other purposes he undergoes a forcing.
→ The end of man belongs to him, it is his very nature and it surpasses this world.

Relative arguments