Not believing in the existence of truth means not believing in anything, believing in pure nothingness, in total absurdity.

Not believing in the existence of truth means not believing in anything, believing in pure nothingness, in total absurdity.

Language: english / italian / spanish / chinese

Above all love
A hidden inheritance

of Francesco Arista and Antonella Molica

Argument

→ If no logic made sense, there would be no sense, no truth and no knowledge.
→ Not believing in the existence of truth means not believing in anything, believing in pure nothingness, in total absurdity.
→ The phrase "No logic makes sense" falsifies itself, is absurd, negative self-referential, therefore there exists a valid logic.
→ A negative self-referential phrase contradicts itself, is false, absurd, a logical trap, certifies its negation and tries to deny the absolute.
→ The opposites of negative self-referential phrases are true in an absolute, unconditional way.
→ Be certain that an eternally true reality exists and belongs to you.

→ Not believing in the existence of truth means not believing in anything, believing in pure nothingness, in total absurdity.

→ The phrase "No logic makes sense" falsifies itself, is absurd, negative self-referential, therefore there exists a valid logic.

→ A negative self-referential phrase contradicts itself, is false, absurd, a logical trap, certifies its negation and tries to deny the absolute.

→ This world only shows temporary, relative, conditioned, changing, ambiguous, non-absolute things.

→ Since it denies the absolute, the world is a self-referential negative formulation, it is false.

→ The certainty of the falsity of the world certifies belonging to eternity.

→ Experience, knowledge of the world always repeats that things are temporary.

→ The phrase "Everything is temporary" is self-referential negative, destructive and absurd.

→ Infinite love is also in bodies, but certainly beyond bodies, even in sensations, but certainly beyond sensations, even in temporariness, but certainly beyond temporariness.
→ I can love you everywhere, but love is uncertain in bodies, in sensations, in what is temporary, it is certain in what is eternal.
→ Certain love is eternal and there I am fully.
→ The relationship with the temporary always has a certain difficulty, if you want certainty you have to look beyond the temporary and I hope you do soon.

→ I am God, your God, your father, the absolute, the one who is forever.

→ You will come to me with all your strength, with full and total love.

Recurrences in the text

→ If no logic made sense, there would be no sense, no truth and no knowledge.
→ Not believing in the existence of truth means not believing in anything, believing in pure nothingness, in total absurdity.
→ The phrase "No logic makes sense" falsifies itself, is absurd, negative self-referential, therefore there exists a valid logic.
→ A negative self-referential phrase contradicts itself, is false, absurd, a logical trap, certifies its negation and tries to deny the absolute.
→ This world only shows temporary, relative, conditioned, changing, ambiguous, non-absolute things.
→ Since it denies the absolute, the world is a self-referential negative formulation, it is false.
→ The certainty of the falsity of the world certifies belonging to eternity.
→ Experience, knowledge of the world always repeats that things are temporary.
→ The phrase "Everything is temporary" is self-referential negative, destructive and absurd.
→ Whoever believes in eternal truth knows that he belongs to it and that he is eternal.
→ I am God, your God, your father, the absolute, the one who is forever.
→ You will come to me with all your strength, with full and total love.

Relative arguments