I can love you everywhere, but love is uncertain in bodies, in sensations, in what is temporary, it is certain in what is eternal.
Above all love
A hidden inheritance
- of Francesco Arista and Antonella Molica
Argument
Recurrences in the text
- → Recognizing the absurdity of denying or neglecting the existence of truth implies absolute truth.
- → If you're sure the world is uncertain, you know you don't belong to it.
- → Certainty belongs to awareness, it is full realization, a permanent state of truth, a definitive, absolute, non-changeable value.
- → If no logic made sense, there would be no sense, no truth and no knowledge.
- → Not believing in the existence of truth means not believing in anything, believing in pure nothingness, in total absurdity.
- → The phrase "No logic makes sense" falsifies itself, is absurd, negative self-referential, therefore there exists a valid logic.
- → A negative self-referential phrase contradicts itself, is false, absurd, a logical trap, certifies its negation and tries to deny the absolute.
- → The opposites of negative self-referential phrases are true in an absolute, unconditional way.
- → Be certain that an eternally true reality exists and belongs to you.
- → If the mind generalizes the voice of the world, it says that everything is temporary.
- → To believe it is necessary to believe that there is truth, a reality that is always true, eternal.
- → Without me, you lose yourself, the world drags you into its illusion, it robs you of the truth, of your eternal identity.
- → Infinite love is also in bodies, but certainly beyond bodies, even in sensations, but certainly beyond sensations, even in temporariness, but certainly beyond temporariness.
- → I can love you everywhere, but love is uncertain in bodies, in sensations, in what is temporary, it is certain in what is eternal.
- → Certain love is eternal and there I am fully.
- → Have faith, love exists and belongs to you.
Relative arguments