You will come to me naturally, when you realize who you have always been.

You will come to me naturally, when you realize who you have always been.

Language: english / italian / spanish / chinese

Above all love
A hidden inheritance

of Francesco Arista and Antonella Molica

Argument

painful

→ You will come to me naturally, when you realize who you have always been.

→ Your destiny, your nature is the truth, and I am it.

→ Pain is part of the body and the world, not of eternity.

→ Your deepest and truest nature is unconditional.

→ The nature of the world's things is ephemeral, ambiguous.

→ The nature of experience is ambiguous if it does not refer to what surpasses it.

→ The material world is by nature fragmentary, hostile to knowledge.

→ Physical nature makes choice difficult, pulls towards matter, to which it belongs.

→ This temporary world has an opposite nature to mine, it's my opposite.

→ Your nature is your destiny, nothing dark belongs to you.

→ The world is an instrument, a means that does not know and does not have its own end.

→ What belongs to the world has the nature of the world, it finds meaning only in being used in view of what surpasses it.

→ Man does not have the nature of the world; in being used for other purposes he undergoes a forcing.

→ The end of man belongs to him, it is his very nature and it surpasses this world.

→ Eternity is your true nature, your destiny, it is not a dream or a myth.

→ The corporeity is the starting point of a path, it does not belong to the absolute end.

→ The very physicality of your body collaborates with the deception of the world, and it is not easy for man to understand who he is and to whom he belongs.

Recurrences in the text

→ You will come to me naturally, when you realize who you have always been.
→ Your destiny, your nature is the truth, and I am it.
→ Pain is part of the body and the world, not of eternity.
→ Your deepest and truest nature is unconditional.
→ The nature of the world's things is ephemeral, ambiguous.
→ The nature of experience is ambiguous if it does not refer to what surpasses it.
→ The material world is by nature fragmentary, hostile to knowledge.
→ Physical nature makes choice difficult, pulls towards matter, to which it belongs.
→ This temporary world has an opposite nature to mine, it's my opposite.
→ Your nature is your destiny, nothing dark belongs to you.
→ The world is an instrument, a means that does not know and does not have its own end.
→ What belongs to the world has the nature of the world, it finds meaning only in being used in view of what surpasses it.
→ Man does not have the nature of the world; in being used for other purposes he undergoes a forcing.
→ The end of man belongs to him, it is his very nature and it surpasses this world.
→ Eternity is your true nature, your destiny, it is not a dream or a myth.
→ The corporeity is the starting point of a path, it does not belong to the absolute end.
→ The very physicality of your body collaborates with the deception of the world, and it is not easy for man to understand who he is and to whom he belongs.

Relative arguments