You can love me as I love you, you have in you an infinite love, but you may not know it and not live it.
Above all love
A hidden inheritance
- of Francesco Arista and Antonella Molica
Argument
- → If I, God, love you and allow you to face such a difficulty, my correctness implies that you are immense, divine, similar to me.
- → If you think about it, you can understand that I am completely unconditional and you are my son, like me.
- → Your experience of my opposite offers you the possibility to choose me with a love similar to mine, because you are similar to me, divine.
- → Observe the darkness of the world and the light of love, choose between them, discover who you are like and who you belong to.
Recurrences in the text
- → God loves himself in man, so he loves man as himself.
- → The contradictions and problems of the world find no solution within it.
- → You and I are eternal.
- → Our love has no end, it is eternal like us.
- → These three dimensions are defined by an absolute and unalterable value.
- → You can love me as I love you, you have in you an infinite love, but you may not know it and not live it.
- → I desire you as equals, face to face, I do not want you as servants.
- → Trust as I do.
- → In every pain there is a particular demand for love on my part.
- → When everything seems lost and you can't find the solution, son, I, your father, am the solution, and everything will seem found.
- → You have nothing in common with this worn and worn-out world, you are by nature like me, but in a potential and unrealized form.
- → Love is not content with uniqueness, it requires the other to love, it prevails over uniqueness and generates the other.
- → My loving nature, my being love, pushes me to create, to a becoming of love.
- → Your experience of my opposite offers you the possibility to choose me with a love similar to mine, because you are similar to me, divine.
- → You and I exist to love.
- → The worst trap in your path is considering yourself different and colliding with others to boost your ego.
- → Men differ temporarily in what they know, they do not differ in who they are.
Relative arguments