Recognizing the absolute truth and the absurdity of its denial, the son remains with the problem of what the world is, the changing object of his experience, the source of an equally changing knowledge.

Recognizing the absolute truth and the absurdity of its denial, the son remains with the problem of what the world is, the changing object of his experience, the source of an equally changing knowledge.

Language: english / italian / spanish / chinese

Above all love
A hidden inheritance

of Francesco Arista and Antonella Molica

Argument

world

→ Your identity, what you are, is what you are for me, it does not change, it is not your state, it is not conditioned, it does not depend on events, the world or history.

→ Your understanding and realization of who you are changes over time.

→ What you are and what happens to you are realities that are not comparable by nature.

→ If you identify with what is happening you devalue yourself, you become heavy, you forget who you are and you suffer.

→ Reflection, intelligence can and must see, recognize and overcome the nature of the cosmos, changing, continuously discontinuous, certainly uncertain, contradictory, tending to annihilate itself, and find in a sure and indissoluble way the immortal nature and its own unity with it.

→ A certainty that is not based on truth is a misleading cognitive error.

→ The path to truth goes through errors, disappointments and restarts, and requires commitment, perseverance and flexibility.

→ The truth is hiding to a superficial way of knowing.

→ The need for a deepening of knowledge accompanies the awareness of one's ignorance, of the disappointment about one's previous knowledge, of the trust in the existence of the truth and of the possibility of knowing it.

→ Sooner or later the son finds himself wondering if the truth exists.
→ Denying that truth exists is tantamount to believing that nothing exists or makes sense, up to the extreme consequence of affirming absolute nothingness.
→ A commitment sufficient in duration and intensity can recognize one's need for certainty and truth.
→ The absurdity of the denial of truth ends up affirming in an absolute way the being of truth, that is, the being of absolute truth.

→ Denying that truth exists is tantamount to believing that nothing exists or makes sense, up to the extreme consequence of affirming absolute nothingness.

→ The absurdity of the denial of truth ends up affirming in an absolute way the being of truth, that is, the being of absolute truth.

→ Recognizing the absolute truth and the absurdity of its denial, the son remains with the problem of what the world is, the changing object of his experience, the source of an equally changing knowledge.

→ By its relative nature the world denies absolute truth, it is an illusion, a trap for the knowledge of truth.

→ When he chooses me in front of the world, my son is certain that he belongs to me and that he is immortal.

Recurrences in the text

→ Your identity, what you are, is what you are for me, it does not change, it is not your state, it is not conditioned, it does not depend on events, the world or history.
→ Your understanding and realization of who you are changes over time.
→ What you are and what happens to you are realities that are not comparable by nature.
→ If you identify with what is happening you devalue yourself, you become heavy, you forget who you are and you suffer.
→ Reflection, intelligence can and must see, recognize and overcome the nature of the cosmos, changing, continuously discontinuous, certainly uncertain, contradictory, tending to annihilate itself, and find in a sure and indissoluble way the immortal nature and its own unity with it.
→ A certainty that is not based on truth is a misleading cognitive error.
→ The path to truth goes through errors, disappointments and restarts, and requires commitment, perseverance and flexibility.
→ The truth is hiding to a superficial way of knowing.
→ The need for a deepening of knowledge accompanies the awareness of one's ignorance, of the disappointment about one's previous knowledge, of the trust in the existence of the truth and of the possibility of knowing it.
→ Sooner or later the son finds himself wondering if the truth exists.
→ Denying that truth exists is tantamount to believing that nothing exists or makes sense, up to the extreme consequence of affirming absolute nothingness.
→ The absurdity of the denial of truth ends up affirming in an absolute way the being of truth, that is, the being of absolute truth.
→ Recognizing the absolute truth and the absurdity of its denial, the son remains with the problem of what the world is, the changing object of his experience, the source of an equally changing knowledge.
→ By its relative nature the world denies absolute truth, it is an illusion, a trap for the knowledge of truth.
→ When he chooses me in front of the world, my son is certain that he belongs to me and that he is immortal.

Relative arguments