Your whole life is busy, revolves around empty, non-existent things, nothingness, loses sight of existing things, such as my love for you, your love for me and the light of which you are in the presence.
Above all love A hidden inheritance
of Francesco Arista and Antonella Molica Argument
→ I desire that you never lose your or my identity , that you are with me in everything you do , that in every action of yours , even for a moment , I am there , you meet me and you love me.→ Work for me, for my kingdom , for this love , to know my and your identity based on love .→ The children of love now know who I am , who they are , live in me, with me, for me and myself for them, united in infinite and eternal communion .
→ I have already said and I tell you that my temple , my home and my house are in love .→ My temple is the spirit of love that opens the doors of the heart , of knowledge , and it is fixed throughout your being .→ I move from eternity to eternity , alive , dwell in my temple and in the eternal spirit of God father .→ You are part of my family , of my holy temple , of me and of my wonders .→ I am the Lord God , a living temple , I teach you to live , to proclaim that I am God , unique and true .
→ In search of love over time , the divine being becomes corrupted and materialized , then recovers what he had lost , enriching himself in multiplicity .→ All the game in the world , all the power of illusion tries to influence what you believe , your way of knowing , but it can not change your nature .→ To attach oneself to the world , to try to know and possess that which you cannot , generate pain , the oblivion of oneself , the enslavement to that which is by nature inferior .→ The relationship with the temporary always has a certain difficulty , if you want certainty you have to look beyond the temporary and I hope you do soon .→ If you are distracted by too many and ambiguous intermediate elements , you cultivate pain , you do not seek , you do not understand the initial , final , unique and present cause .
Relative arguments