Man needs to understand this love, my love, his love, can do it in silence, can not do it in a world full of noise, vanity, appearance, seduction, which makes him prisoner of a sick and not existent love.
Above all love A hidden inheritance
of Francesco Arista and Antonella Molica Argument
→ You have to know and to recognize this love , that I love my children and that my children love me. → My spirit reflects the light , this harmony and the love that every man seeks .→ I want children who recognize this light and this love .→ Man needs to understand this love , my love , his love , can do it in silence , can not do it in a world full of noise , vanity , appearance , seduction , which makes him prisoner of a sick and not existent love .→ We are united by this light and this love .
→ I, The Lord , live from ever and forever in the immortal infinite , where is my residence , my temple and my kingdom .→ I, the Lord God , am love , I have revealed to you that my essence , my knowledge , my kingdom is of love .→ My sanctuary , my home , my kingdom welcomes my children in light and in love .→ My kingdom , my throne is eternal , founded only on love and you are .→ The dwelling where I live is also my glory , my throne and my endless realm .
→ My sons , knock down your insecurities , every illusion and disappointment , destroy what causes pain , poverty and deception , free yourself from what hurts you, reflecting in silence that evil can not do anything because I am the only , immortal and indestructible certainty .→ The trial that now touches the world is for the benefit of all of you, my children , it shows you the ephemeral nature of things in the world and draws your attention to me, your eternal need for love and certainty .→ Reflection , intelligence can and must see , recognize and overcome the nature of the cosmos , changing , continuously discontinuous , certainly uncertain , contradictory , tending to annihilate itself , and find in a sure and indissoluble way the immortal nature and its own unity with it.
Relative arguments