I love my children, I know that my children love me, they already possess love, they do not bring out love because they are taken by the poverty and misery of the world.
Above all love A hidden inheritance
of Francesco Arista and Antonella Molica Argument
→ I did all this for you.
→ I love my children , I know that my children love me, they already possess love , they do not bring out love because they are taken by the poverty and misery of the world .→ The children I have created are driven to know eternity , to reach eternity by experiencing the world , the flesh , all the absurd conditions , situations , choices that the world has imposed in a hard , impatient and cruel way .→ I do not condition my sons .→ Love me infinitely , without conditions , at any time of life .→ This path leads man to his real fullness , to minimize the world and any harmful conditioning .
→ My children turn , spin , fall on the same difficulties , they can 't understand , they can 't comprehend my nature , the essence of God the father , this love given , which is only for all of them.→ In donating be altruistic , do not expect reward , be happy not to have anything in return , expect in return eternal love , that I always give you.→ The knowledge of the contrast between my omnipotent and loving nature , and the enormous malignancy of the cosmos , shows you what I have given you from the beginning , my nature .→ Seeing me in others regardless of their awareness is an immense gift , a high degree of truth , a seeing what is beyond the illusions of the world .→ The world imposes considerable limits and illusions on you, which you must experience and which one day will appear to you for what they are , little , nothing , a game compared to what I give you.
→ The fulfilled son realizes me as father and he as son , reaching what he was created for, he knows love , me, himself , eternity , my face , the father in all his essence , depth , up to the the most eternal part , he knows now that he lives only for me, the father , and he comes with me.
Relative arguments