I can love you everywhere, but love is uncertain in bodies, in sensations, in what is temporary, it is certain in what is eternal.

I can love you everywhere, but love is uncertain in bodies, in sensations, in what is temporary, it is certain in what is eternal.

Language: english / italian / spanish / chinese

Above all love
A hidden inheritance

of Francesco Arista and Antonella Molica

Argument

→ Recognizing the absurdity of denying or neglecting the existence of truth implies absolute truth.

→ If you're sure the world is uncertain, you know you don't belong to it.

→ Certainty belongs to awareness, it is full realization, a permanent state of truth, a definitive, absolute, non-changeable value.

→ If no logic made sense, there would be no sense, no truth and no knowledge.
→ Not believing in the existence of truth means not believing in anything, believing in pure nothingness, in total absurdity.
→ The phrase "No logic makes sense" falsifies itself, is absurd, negative self-referential, therefore there exists a valid logic.
→ A negative self-referential phrase contradicts itself, is false, absurd, a logical trap, certifies its negation and tries to deny the absolute.
→ The opposites of negative self-referential phrases are true in an absolute, unconditional way.
→ Be certain that an eternally true reality exists and belongs to you.

→ This world only shows temporary, relative, conditioned, changing, ambiguous, non-absolute things.
→ Since it denies the absolute, the world is a self-referential negative formulation, it is false.
→ The certainty of the falsity of the world certifies belonging to eternity.

→ The phrase "No logic makes sense" falsifies itself, is absurd, negative self-referential, therefore there exists a valid logic.

→ A negative self-referential phrase contradicts itself, is false, absurd, a logical trap, certifies its negation and tries to deny the absolute.

→ The opposites of negative self-referential phrases are true in an absolute, unconditional way.

→ Be certain that an eternally true reality exists and belongs to you.

→ Whoever believes in eternal truth knows that he belongs to it and that he is eternal.

→ Infinite love is also in bodies, but certainly beyond bodies, even in sensations, but certainly beyond sensations, even in temporariness, but certainly beyond temporariness.

→ I can love you everywhere, but love is uncertain in bodies, in sensations, in what is temporary, it is certain in what is eternal.

→ Certain love is eternal and there I am fully.

→ Have faith, love exists and belongs to you.

→ If you believe in me, in our bond, in indestructibility, you cannot take into account or worry about what is ephemeral.

→ The trial that now touches the world is for the benefit of all of you, my children, it shows you the ephemeral nature of things in the world and draws your attention to me, your eternal need for love and certainty.

→ The truth is eternal, the illusion is temporary.

Recurrences in the text

→ Recognizing the absurdity of denying or neglecting the existence of truth implies absolute truth.
→ If you're sure the world is uncertain, you know you don't belong to it.
→ Certainty belongs to awareness, it is full realization, a permanent state of truth, a definitive, absolute, non-changeable value.
→ If no logic made sense, there would be no sense, no truth and no knowledge.
→ Not believing in the existence of truth means not believing in anything, believing in pure nothingness, in total absurdity.
→ The phrase "No logic makes sense" falsifies itself, is absurd, negative self-referential, therefore there exists a valid logic.
→ A negative self-referential phrase contradicts itself, is false, absurd, a logical trap, certifies its negation and tries to deny the absolute.
→ The opposites of negative self-referential phrases are true in an absolute, unconditional way.
→ Be certain that an eternally true reality exists and belongs to you.
→ Whoever believes in eternal truth knows that he belongs to it and that he is eternal.
→ Infinite love is also in bodies, but certainly beyond bodies, even in sensations, but certainly beyond sensations, even in temporariness, but certainly beyond temporariness.
→ I can love you everywhere, but love is uncertain in bodies, in sensations, in what is temporary, it is certain in what is eternal.
→ Certain love is eternal and there I am fully.
→ Have faith, love exists and belongs to you.
→ If you believe in me, in our bond, in indestructibility, you cannot take into account or worry about what is ephemeral.
→ The trial that now touches the world is for the benefit of all of you, my children, it shows you the ephemeral nature of things in the world and draws your attention to me, your eternal need for love and certainty.
→ The truth is eternal, the illusion is temporary.

Relative arguments