The trial that now touches the world is for the benefit of all of you, my children, it shows you the ephemeral nature of things in the world and draws your attention to me, your eternal need for love and certainty.
Above all love A hidden inheritance
of Francesco Arista and Antonella Molica Argument
Recurrences in the text
→ The world is an evanescent illusion , it seems beautiful , but if you love it, it poisons you, but not permanently .→ Every game in the world will have an end .→ The world becomes important for those who ignore eternity , but this illusion is short .→ If you fear or crave the world , you can not observe it, you lose sight of the truth , you and me, you can not love me.→ Leave the world alone , because it does not love you, it does not belong to you and it is not your destiny .→ To win the world , man must have an end beyond the world , and adhere to that end until he considers the secondary world , devoid of true reality .→ If you knew me, you wouldn 't be scandalized , you'd smile at the events of the world .→ Pain is the difference between what you want and what happens .→ To be able to see the world for what it is , it is necessary to know eternity and to look at temporariness from a position that transcends it.→ In the world it is difficult to understand and remember that I exist , I am eternal and I love you, that you have divine nature and the world is not real .→ The physical and biological structure of the world itself is painful , conditioned , fragile and transitory .→ I am everything and you are mine , worthy of my love and my presence .→ The world is uncertain , temporary , false , my opposite , it does not show the full truth and does not love .→ The trial that now touches the world is for the benefit of all of you, my children , it shows you the ephemeral nature of things in the world and draws your attention to me, your eternal need for love and certainty .→ Observe your brothers with my love , as eternal souls , at worst lost in the world , not as bodies , distinguish the eternal and the insubstantial .Relative arguments