I love, I act out of love, I have love as the only end.
Above all love
A hidden inheritance
- of Francesco Arista and Antonella Molica
Argument
Recurrences in the text
- → I love, I act out of love, I have love as the only end.
- → Man is destined to love God and is able to do so in spite of any difficulty level.
- → The world is the negative pole of choice and has the task of deceiving man and making him suffer until man decides to love God fully.
- → Let the world go where it has to go, to nothing.
- → If you fear or crave the world, you can not observe it, you lose sight of the truth, you and me, you can not love me.
- → For God the world is a game.
- → If you don't let it, the world can't do anything to you or possess you.
- → Temporaneity, fragility, a way of being destined not to be, expresses the contradiction, the ambiguity of the world and of what belongs to it.
- → This temporary world has an opposite nature to mine, it's my opposite.
- → The malignity of the world is amplified, not caused, by the man who ignores it, deceived, possessed, drugged by the world, in a state of painful slavery.
- → The solution to the world's problems does not belong to the world, it transcends it.
- → Because of your coming from a state of unconsciousness you may tend to forget me, to get caught up in other thoughts, but every time you think of me it is an act of love.
- → Every act of love has great value, it's a jewel.
- → Only the certainty of eternal truth and his bond to it can enable man to overcome the burden of the world.
- → Mind me, take care of me more than the events of the world.
- → Every choice has the same nature as its object, it loves its object, unites and adapts to it.
- → A strong attachment to what belongs to the world is failure, because man cannot possess what belongs to the world.
- → The ambiguity of the world destroys what belongs to it and highlights the futility of choosing it.
Relative arguments