I can love you everywhere, but love is uncertain in bodies, in sensations, in what is temporary, it is certain in what is eternal.
Above all love
A hidden inheritance
- of Francesco Arista and Antonella Molica
Argument
Recurrences in the text
- → Recognizing the absurdity of denying or neglecting the existence of truth implies absolute truth.
- → If you're sure the world is uncertain, you know you don't belong to it.
- → Certainty belongs to awareness, it is full realization, a permanent state of truth, a definitive, absolute, non-changeable value.
- → If no logic made sense, there would be no sense, no truth and no knowledge.
- → Not believing in the existence of truth means not believing in anything, believing in pure nothingness, in total absurdity.
- → The phrase "No logic makes sense" falsifies itself, is absurd, negative self-referential, therefore there exists a valid logic.
- → A negative self-referential phrase contradicts itself, is false, absurd, a logical trap, certifies its negation and tries to deny the absolute.
- → The opposites of negative self-referential phrases are true in an absolute, unconditional way.
- → Be certain that an eternally true reality exists and belongs to you.
- → If the mind generalizes the voice of the world, it says that everything is temporary.
- → To believe it is necessary to believe that there is truth, a reality that is always true, eternal.
- → Whoever believes in eternal truth knows that he belongs to it and that he is eternal.
- → Without me, you lose yourself, the world drags you into its illusion, it robs you of the truth, of your eternal identity.
- → I can love you everywhere, but love is uncertain in bodies, in sensations, in what is temporary, it is certain in what is eternal.
- → Have faith, love exists and belongs to you.
- → The trial that now touches the world is for the benefit of all of you, my children, it shows you the ephemeral nature of things in the world and draws your attention to me, your eternal need for love and certainty.
Relative arguments