The world can not do anything to you, it can not destroy this love between you and me, it can distort and deform only the reality that belongs to it.
Above all love A hidden inheritance
of Francesco Arista and Antonella Molica Argument
→ In addition , pain has a significant subjective factor , the difference between what you want and what happens , a difference on which man can gradually intervene .→ The mind tends to tell stories , interpretations of the past or any future possibilities , pleasant or unpleasant , fearful or desirable , linked to temporality , to the unawareness of eternity .→ The love I offer you has no limits , and desires your love , your free choice , comparable to mine in intensity .→ I love you and I want you with a desire that exceeds the sum of human emotions of all time .
→ Self -confidence is necessary for the journey , but it must be ready to detach itself from any temporary form .→ You can win the world in terms of awareness , love , abandonment , trust and courage .→ You are destined for an unlimited good , but first you must achieve complete trust in me.→ To love me it is enough to believe in me, trust me, remember my love and our mutual belonging .→ I'm leading you, trust me, don 't strain yourself , be calm .→ The awakening of man in the world requires will , love , balance , an intelligent and confident energy .
→ All the game in the world , all the power of illusion tries to influence what you believe , your way of knowing , but it can not change your nature .→ This pain , this illusion has no sense or outlet in itself , it is functional to your awakening , to ignite your intelligence and your love for the truth .→ The experience of the world is an illusion , it conditions you continuously , with an enormous amount of false information since your childhood , since you could not recognize it.→ The world is by nature fragile , temporary , constantly trying to delude and disappoint you, to convince you that you have its nature , that you are fragile , temporary , and you belong to it.
Relative arguments