To love me is simple, it is to be yourself, because you exist for my love and to love me.

To love me is simple, it is to be yourself, because you exist for my love and to love me.

Language: english / italian / spanish / chinese

Above all love
A hidden inheritance

of Francesco Arista and Antonella Molica

Argument

don't neglect me

→ You can not write.

→ You do not have to write.

→ I have created you for greatness and not for smallness, for certainty and not for insecurity, to look for me and nothing else, for the freedom of love in me and for me, as I live for all of you children.
→ Free yourself from what makes you unhappy, does not give you certainty, makes your life empty.
→ You are free to do it.
→ Freedom, light and love shine in you.
→ You are free to do it or not.
→ You are free, I do not want to force you.
→ Love is a free act.

→ Freedom, light and love shine in you.

→ You are free to do it or not.

→ I want my children the same security and certainty in the love that I have for them.
→ Peace is what makes my children safe, mine, in balance and in harmony.
→ The image that the world gives to my children makes them insecure and drags them into what is miserable.
→ If you trust me, you feel safe.

→ Do not hate.
→ If you do not know how to love me, do not hate, do not destroy yourselves, do not feel defeated, because in this imperfection, every day, I reveal, I see the desire, the commitment and the fatigue you put.
→ I create and not destroy, love and not hate, and I am not the darkness in this dark world, because I am the light.
→ Contemplate the illusion, do not fight it, do not despise it, do not love it, do not hate it, observe its emptiness.
→ Desire without hatred the end of your pain, the murderous evil.
→ Do not judge, do not hate and you will live happily.
→ Love and do not hate.

→ Do not oppose the choices of others.

→ Everyone chooses as he wants.

→ You can and must choose me, if you want to discover the truth, your essential freedom, who you are, who I am, our love and the illusion of the world.

→ My love is infinite, unconditional, it cannot be influenced, it does not depend on events.

→ If no logic made sense, there would be no sense, no truth and no knowledge.
→ Not believing in the existence of truth means not believing in anything, believing in pure nothingness, in total absurdity.
→ The phrase "No logic makes sense" falsifies itself, is absurd, negative self-referential, therefore there exists a valid logic.
→ A negative self-referential phrase contradicts itself, is false, absurd, a logical trap, certifies its negation and tries to deny the absolute.
→ The opposites of negative self-referential phrases are true in an absolute, unconditional way.
→ Be certain that an eternally true reality exists and belongs to you.

→ To love me is simple, it is to be yourself, because you exist for my love and to love me.

→ I am with each of you unconditionally, regardless of what you do or feel.

→ I love you, I have chosen you in a total, unlimited and unconditional way.

→ Being full, total love and unconditional choice coincide.

Recurrences in the text

→ You can not write.
→ You do not have to write.
→ You are free to do it.
→ Freedom, light and love shine in you.
→ You are free to do it or not.
→ You are free, I do not want to force you.
→ Do not judge, do not hate and you will live happily.
→ Do not oppose the choices of others.
→ Everyone chooses as he wants.
→ You can and must choose me, if you want to discover the truth, your essential freedom, who you are, who I am, our love and the illusion of the world.
→ My love is infinite, unconditional, it cannot be influenced, it does not depend on events.
→ The opposites of negative self-referential phrases are true in an absolute, unconditional way.
→ To love me is simple, it is to be yourself, because you exist for my love and to love me.
→ I am with each of you unconditionally, regardless of what you do or feel.
→ I love you, I have chosen you in a total, unlimited and unconditional way.
→ Being full, total love and unconditional choice coincide.

Relative arguments