Not believing in the existence of truth means not believing in anything, believing in pure nothingness, in total absurdity.

Not believing in the existence of truth means not believing in anything, believing in pure nothingness, in total absurdity.

Language: english / italian / spanish / chinese

Above all love
A hidden inheritance

of Francesco Arista and Antonella Molica

Argument

→ The certainty that you find in me contrasts with the uncertainty that the world has by nature and gives you.
→ Whoever recognizes the difference between God and the world knows well who he is and to whom he belongs.
→ If the divine being is bound to uncertainty, he feels a lot of pain, but only for a while.

→ Adhering to a false certainty is devastating.

→ Every search for efficiency implies subjective truth.

→ The use of technology products implies objective truth.

→ If you have a certainty, you know you belong to it.

→ If no logic made sense, there would be no sense, no truth and no knowledge.

→ Not believing in the existence of truth means not believing in anything, believing in pure nothingness, in total absurdity.

→ The phrase "No logic makes sense" falsifies itself, is absurd, negative self-referential, therefore there exists a valid logic.

→ A negative self-referential phrase contradicts itself, is false, absurd, a logical trap, certifies its negation and tries to deny the absolute.

→ This world only shows temporary, relative, conditioned, changing, ambiguous, non-absolute things.

→ To realize the unconditional truth in the world is a very high goal, a perfection not easy even to believe and desire.
→ My love is infinite, unconditional, it cannot be influenced, it does not depend on events.
→ The opposites of negative self-referential phrases are true in an absolute, unconditional way.
→ I am with each of you unconditionally, regardless of what you do or feel.
→ I, God, love you according to my nature, in an infinite, unlimited and unconditional way.

→ The certainty of the falsity of the world certifies belonging to eternity.

→ Experience, knowledge of the world always repeats that things are temporary.

→ The phrase "Everything is temporary" is self-referential negative, destructive and absurd.

→ Whoever believes in eternal truth knows that he belongs to it and that he is eternal.

Recurrences in the text

→ If the divine being is bound to uncertainty, he feels a lot of pain, but only for a while.
→ Adhering to a false certainty is devastating.
→ Every search for efficiency implies subjective truth.
→ The use of technology products implies objective truth.
→ If you have a certainty, you know you belong to it.
→ If no logic made sense, there would be no sense, no truth and no knowledge.
→ Not believing in the existence of truth means not believing in anything, believing in pure nothingness, in total absurdity.
→ The phrase "No logic makes sense" falsifies itself, is absurd, negative self-referential, therefore there exists a valid logic.
→ A negative self-referential phrase contradicts itself, is false, absurd, a logical trap, certifies its negation and tries to deny the absolute.
→ This world only shows temporary, relative, conditioned, changing, ambiguous, non-absolute things.
→ Since it denies the absolute, the world is a self-referential negative formulation, it is false.
→ The certainty of the falsity of the world certifies belonging to eternity.
→ Experience, knowledge of the world always repeats that things are temporary.
→ The phrase "Everything is temporary" is self-referential negative, destructive and absurd.
→ Whoever believes in eternal truth knows that he belongs to it and that he is eternal.

Relative arguments