To live means to love God, to love God in all his fullness and awareness, to belong to him in everything, to love him and to live him in the daily life and in the brothers we meet, to be with God, to speak with him, to be moulded with him, to feel alive with him and for him, to complete oneself in him in love.
Above all love A hidden inheritance
of Francesco Arista and Antonella Molica Argument
→ If he refuses what he is , man loses himself , he cedes beeing to things , to nothingness , and suffers .→ In rejecting love , you lose your realization , you suffer and you make others suffer .→ Every man can and must realize eternity , because he possesses it by nature and can not lose it.→ If you fear or crave the world , you can not observe it, you lose sight of the truth , you and me, you can not love me.
→ If no logic made sense , there would be no sense , no truth and no knowledge .→ Not believing in the existence of truth means not believing in anything , believing in pure nothingness , in total absurdity .→ The phrase "No logic makes sense " falsifies itself , is absurd , negative self -referential , therefore there exists a valid logic .→ A negative self -referential phrase contradicts itself , is false , absurd , a logical trap , certifies its negation and tries to deny the absolute .→ The opposites of negative self -referential phrases are true in an absolute , unconditional way .→ Be certain that an eternally true reality exists and belongs to you.
→ You fight , act disorderly , confusingly , sometimes you do not understand all that surrounds you, that gives you pain and anguish .→ Whoever finds me, finds , reaches peace , justice , purity , full light , full love , the freedom to truly be a child who moves , acts , walks in me and in love .→ The world strikes you, confuses you, upsets you, deceives you and seduces you.→ This world proclaims and makes us experience the temporariness and precariousness of everything , in the false perspective of the final victory of pure nothingness , of total annihilation .
Relative arguments