If you want to notice it, you have to think about it voluntarily, with love.
Above all love
A hidden inheritance
- of Francesco Arista and Antonella Molica
Argument
Recurrences in the text
- → Man can and must know and follow the way to overcome evil.
- → If you want to notice it, you have to think about it voluntarily, with love.
- → The unconscious is involuntary, automatic, conditioned by something other than himself, obeys a mechanism, is not able to choose.
- → Man is destined to love God and is able to do so in spite of any difficulty level.
- → This world offers man the possibility of making the opposite choice to God, of denying, rejecting God and experiencing its consequences.
- → Ignoring the difference between temporary and eternal is the cause of pain.
- → If you fear or crave the world, you can not observe it, you lose sight of the truth, you and me, you can not love me.
- → Don't you understand the difference between me and what you attend to while you neglect me?
- → The world tries to keep you from knowing me, but you can love me in the world.
- → To win the world, man must have an end beyond the world, and adhere to that end until he considers the secondary world, devoid of true reality.
- → The conditionings of materiality are very strong, unbeatable on its plane.
- → Our love is invincible, eternal like you and me.
- → I allow this pain in view of a project of infinite love, that overturns and transcends life in the world.
- → I invite you to understand that you are not of this world, that I, God, exist, I am perfect, omnipotent, I love you, I have destined you to eternal joy in my world, with me, in full awareness of the truth.
- → When you see what the world is like for me, you'll have a good laugh.
- → When you are assailed by any doubt, son, embrace me, the father, and any doubt will disappear with my warmth of father.
- → The world does not love, and therefore deceives, destroys and annihilates itself.
- → If you don't have the strength to seek and see what's always true, you can't have meaningful relationships.
Relative arguments