My sons are not created for misery or limited in love, they are loved, desired, desired by true love, created for wealth, greatness, special encounter with me as father, creatures, sons of light and not of darkness, of love and not of anger, of peace and not of rancour, of harmony and not of confusion.
Above all love A hidden inheritance
of Francesco Arista and Antonella Molica Argument
→ My project is the knowledge of me father , that knowledge of love , the conviction of never wanting to detach from me and of feeling me indispensable .→ I, the Lord God , am for you and only for you the light , the love , the unique essence and projected target .→ My words , my glances , my thoughts are of sweetness , have you as unique purpose and project .→ I have created you for this love between me and you in a dialogue , in a love meeting , for love , for a great project , for joy and for union .→ My project is blossoming , the greatness of being children who are convinced to love and have pure thoughts .
→ My sons are not created for misery or limited in love , they are loved , desired , desired by true love , created for wealth , greatness , special encounter with me as father , creatures , sons of light and not of darkness , of love and not of anger , of peace and not of rancour , of harmony and not of confusion .
→ In the divine plan of the development of love , pain is a considerable component which tends to activate the search for its overcoming , the necessity of awakening .→ If you consider what you want in the world to be true or primary , if you try to control and condition what happens , you end up suffering a lot , because you cannot control the world .→ Let the world go its own way , towards nothingness , according to its destiny , not to waste time and energy in trying to conquer it, possess it, save it or enjoy it more than much .→ In this world , material logic imposes itself on man before he is able to defend himself , but it is subjected to destruction , and this painful bond pushes man to seek beyond .
Relative arguments