For love God and the world are opposed, you love one of the two and neglect the other.
Above all love
A hidden inheritance
- of Francesco Arista and Antonella Molica
Argument
Recurrences in the text
- → For a few moments don't let your mind or your attention wander on what is worth little, and turn to me with love.
- → Choose me consciously and discover that you can find me whenever you want, to your immense advantage.
- → Love with strength, with intelligence, with courage, intensely.
- → The greater your love, the more you resemble me and realize you.
- → The unconscious needs rules, but whoever is close to the truth easily finds the appropriate act.
- → Ignorance, pain, selfishness and death are not for you, they are not compatible with your true nature.
- → The ambiguity of the world destroys what belongs to it and highlights the futility of choosing it.
- → The announcement, the revelation, the need to know and love tell man to direct his choice towards me.
- → There is always light beyond the darkness, but the eyes of the body do not see the eternal light.
- → Observe your need, desire and love of truth.
- → For love God and the world are opposed, you love one of the two and neglect the other.
- → If you don't have the strength to seek and see what's always true, you can't have meaningful relationships.
- → If you want you can oppose the world and return to the truth, and in this act you find yourself and a deep understanding for others.
- → If everything were temporary, silence would be too, therefore absolute silence is absurd, contradictory, unthinkable, impracticable.
- → Love is the sign of the realization of coherence and of the individual.
- → Strengthening the mind with concentration without adjusting its goals leads to more pain, but opens up the possibility of a later turn towards higher goals.
- → What you now live in the perishable dimension, subjected to temporariness, is a brief and intense negative experience, which invites you to recognize and desire the gift for which I have destined you.
Relative arguments