Nothing temporary is comparable to that which is immortal in nature.

Nothing temporary is comparable to that which is immortal in nature.

Language: english / italian / spanish / chinese

Above all love
A hidden inheritance

of Francesco Arista and Antonella Molica

Argument

→ Nothing temporary is comparable to that which is immortal in nature.

→ You will come to me naturally, when you realize who you have always been.

→ You too are by nature light, but if you don't know it, the world, the darkness, takes possession of you.
→ If you sleep spiritually you are like a ghost, alive by nature and dead in consciousness.
→ Only man-God can walk this path, and the nature of every man is divine.
→ Your nature is able to win the world.

→ Pain is part of the body and the world, not of eternity.

→ Your deepest and truest nature is unconditional.

→ The nature of the world's things is ephemeral, ambiguous.

→ The nature of experience is ambiguous if it does not refer to what surpasses it.

→ The material world is by nature fragmentary, hostile to knowledge.

→ What you are has nothing in common with the temporary nature of the world.

→ This temporary world has an opposite nature to mine, it's my opposite.

→ Your nature is your destiny, nothing dark belongs to you.

→ The world is an instrument, a means that does not know and does not have its own end.

→ What belongs to the world has the nature of the world, it finds meaning only in being used in view of what surpasses it.

→ Man does not have the nature of the world; in being used for other purposes he undergoes a forcing.

→ The end of man belongs to him, it is his very nature and it surpasses this world.

→ Eternity is your true nature, your destiny, it is not a dream or a myth.

Recurrences in the text

→ Nothing temporary is comparable to that which is immortal in nature.
→ You will come to me naturally, when you realize who you have always been.
→ Your nature is able to win the world.
→ Pain is part of the body and the world, not of eternity.
→ Your deepest and truest nature is unconditional.
→ The nature of the world's things is ephemeral, ambiguous.
→ The nature of experience is ambiguous if it does not refer to what surpasses it.
→ The material world is by nature fragmentary, hostile to knowledge.
→ What you are has nothing in common with the temporary nature of the world.
→ This temporary world has an opposite nature to mine, it's my opposite.
→ Your nature is your destiny, nothing dark belongs to you.
→ The world is an instrument, a means that does not know and does not have its own end.
→ What belongs to the world has the nature of the world, it finds meaning only in being used in view of what surpasses it.
→ Man does not have the nature of the world; in being used for other purposes he undergoes a forcing.
→ The end of man belongs to him, it is his very nature and it surpasses this world.
→ Eternity is your true nature, your destiny, it is not a dream or a myth.

Relative arguments