Now the son feels and lives every moment in love, because he has really known me in love, he is convinced, in awareness, in realization, my son, he understands me, the love he has inside and outside.
Above all love A hidden inheritance
of Francesco Arista and Antonella Molica Argument
→ To know me is not difficult or complicated , because I am not complicated .→ Arriving at this love , no man , no child needs the world anymore , because he already knows in depth , in a dimension of love , his condition is that of a child free from the world , from every sort of shell , armor that the world imposed on him , he is not a slave , a prisoner .→ Now the son feels and lives every moment in love , because he has really known me in love , he is convinced , in awareness , in realization , my son , he understands me, the love he has inside and outside .→ Loving is to meet me, to know me and to know oneself .
→ The children of justice entertain each other , win over others in love , love like their father , manage to emanate light , have their whole being in light , in love , in peace , they see , hear , speak , act , they participate in equality , in prudence , above all in love and with the eyes of the father .
→ Understanding the non-worth of the world , you know of being eternal , divine .→ But if you value the world as non-null, that is , you give it a value of truth , then evaluate yourself as finite , similar to the world , temporary .→ If you believe the world important to God , you consider God similar to the world , limited , finite , relative , and you do not know God .
→ Observe the always present truth , by nature still and eternal , even in illusion .→ This world with its traps is illusion without love .→ The world is an evanescent illusion , it seems beautiful , but if you love it, it poisons you, but not permanently .→ You are called to choose between the absolute truth and the illusion of the world , the worst of drugs .→ Pain is illusory .→ Do not love lying , the great thief , the world , illusion , not being .
Relative arguments