God loves, reveals to men and pursues each one of you only with love.
Above all love
A hidden inheritance
- of Francesco Arista and Antonella Molica
Argument
- → I affirm that I reveal every day to every my child, that I will attract everyone to me and that every man will be able to know what he wanted to know in all his life.
- → Between me and my children the difference does not exist, there is in common the love, the greatness and the eternal destiny for which they were created.
- → My children feel alone in wandering, in search of satisfying their existence, love they seek with force and they do not find in the world.
- → Now I live in my son, I am here in all my son, I am present, alive, true, existent, because I am the absolute eternity, immortality and truth.
- → I am the Lord God who loves you from the depths of his being, the great soul of eternity and of his children.
- → The son who stands beside the brother who has recognized me, understands that the other belongs to what surpasses the world, to an unexplored boundary, this new dimension, revelation, is convinced of the kingdom, of eternity, of this well-being that he sees in the brother who has discovered it, and he too wants to shine.
- → What I want is the known love, in the awareness, in the conviction of your and of my eternal belonging.
- → The children of peace reflect, expand this peace, love harmony, continue to love, stand out in peace, have a balance and an identity that makes them shine.
- → The children of light feel confident, aware of the light that invades them continuously, of their identity, of my identity, of that revelation, and live happy with me.
- → The path of development from painful ignorance to the light of absolute love is allowed and guaranteed by the spiritual identity of man's ultimate nature.
- → A violent illusion tyrannizes you, violates your knowledge, takes away your identity, makes you slaves of nothing.
- → Without me, you lose yourself, the world drags you into its illusion, it robs you of the truth, of your eternal identity.
Relative arguments