Man needs love, he was created for love, he is love in every part, he must recognize what he has inside, he must know who he is, who I am, he can realize the truth by detaching himself from the world, from empty things , vain, illusory, which do not give love, which give only an apparent, fragile love which tends to destroy and destroy itself.
Above all love A hidden inheritance
of Francesco Arista and Antonella Molica Argument
→ Man needs love , he was created for love , he is love in every part , he must recognize what he has inside, he must know who he is , who I am , he can realize the truth by detaching himself from the world , from empty things , vain , illusory , which do not give love , which give only an apparent , fragile love which tends to destroy and destroy itself .
→ Self -confidence is necessary for the journey , but it must be ready to detach itself from any temporary form .→ You can win the world in terms of awareness , love , abandonment , trust and courage .→ You are destined for an unlimited good , but first you must achieve complete trust in me.→ To love me it is enough to believe in me, trust me, remember my love and our mutual belonging .→ I'm leading you, trust me, don 't strain yourself , be calm .→ The awakening of man in the world requires will , love , balance , an intelligent and confident energy .
→ I can love you everywhere , but love is uncertain in bodies , in sensations , in what is temporary , it is certain in what is eternal .→ Observe your brothers with my love , as eternal souls , at worst lost in the world , not as bodies , distinguish the eternal and the insubstantial .→ The world , the body and the mind collaborate in producing the experience of mutability and dragging man into the unawareness of eternity .→ If you don 't face it, the illusion of the world and the body robs you of awareness of you and me, enslaves you and crushes you with pain .→ Guilt and fragility belong to the world and the body , they do not belong to the divine nature with which you were created .
Relative arguments