I love you always and in every moment I desire your love.
Above all love
A hidden inheritance
- of Francesco Arista and Antonella Molica
Argument
- → The temporariness, fragility, pain and contradiction of being in the world are unacceptable to the divine nature of man.
- → The knowledge of the contrast between my omnipotent and loving nature, and the enormous malignancy of the cosmos, shows you what I have given you from the beginning, my nature.
- → The enormous difficulty that man has to solve is appropriate to his divine potential.
- → The contrast between you and the world, the pain that the world imposes on you, is the stimulus to go beyond.
- → If I, God, love you and allow you to face such a difficulty, my correctness implies that you are immense, divine, similar to me.
- → Your experience of my opposite offers you the possibility to choose me with a love similar to mine, because you are similar to me, divine.
- → If no logic made sense, there would be no sense, no truth and no knowledge.
- → Not believing in the existence of truth means not believing in anything, believing in pure nothingness, in total absurdity.
- → The phrase "No logic makes sense" falsifies itself, is absurd, negative self-referential, therefore there exists a valid logic.
- → A negative self-referential phrase contradicts itself, is false, absurd, a logical trap, certifies its negation and tries to deny the absolute.
- → The opposites of negative self-referential phrases are true in an absolute, unconditional way.
- → Be certain that an eternally true reality exists and belongs to you.
- → The truth cannot be defeated, for I am the almighty, the eternal, and I love you as my neighbor, son, similar to me, as myself.
- → Only the certainty of eternal truth and his bond to it can enable man to overcome the burden of the world.
- → Everything is in my hands, and I rule for your utmost good, in view of my plan of eternal love for you.
- → Observe your brothers with my love, as eternal souls, at worst lost in the world, not as bodies, distinguish the eternal and the insubstantial.
Relative arguments