Man needs love, he was created for love, he is love in every part, he must recognize what he has inside, he must know who he is, who I am, he can realize the truth by detaching himself from the world, from empty things , vain, illusory, which do not give love, which give only an apparent, fragile love which tends to destroy and destroy itself.
Above all love A hidden inheritance
of Francesco Arista and Antonella Molica Argument
→ Man needs love , he was created for love , he is love in every part , he must recognize what he has inside, he must know who he is , who I am , he can realize the truth by detaching himself from the world , from empty things , vain , illusory , which do not give love , which give only an apparent , fragile love which tends to destroy and destroy itself .
→ Think that your father never leaves you alone , that you have not been created to be prisoners , that you are free and children of the father .→ Love between me and you is indispensable , it gives certainty , stability , coherence , it does not cheat and makes you free .→ The knowledge of our relationship , our nature and the nature of the world , frees you from the slavery that oppresses you in the material world .→ A person sufficiently free from the patterns of the world , gifted with attention and logic , can see things as they are .→ The love I offer you has no limits , and desires your love , your free choice , comparable to mine in intensity .
→ Do not love , do not want for you and do not look for things or relationships that are vain , false , empty , apparent , not sincere .→ To search within the world for his solution is a trap , the root of ambiguity and illusion .→ I love you as you are , I accept how you love me now, your way of looking for me, and I take into account your difficulties .→ I allow the cosmic illusion to try to deceive you, because I know the unlimited potential I have placed in you.→ Knowledge seeks and postulates unity and truth , implies a unitary truth , goes beyond the composed structure of matter .
Relative arguments