Happy is the man who recognizes in hiding, in silence, the face, tenderness and sweetness of the father.

Happy is the man who recognizes in hiding, in silence, the face, tenderness and sweetness of the father.

Language: english / italian / spanish / chinese

Above all love
A hidden inheritance

of Francesco Arista and Antonella Molica

Argument

→ Happy is the man who recognizes in hiding, in silence, the face, tenderness and sweetness of the father.

→ I stand next to you, hidden and silent.

→ Silence is a request for love.

→ This is eternal truth, so it is me.

→ Silence is a valid choice in its time, but it is not the final choice, eternal, full of joy and love.

→ Adhering to a false certainty is devastating.
→ Every search for efficiency implies subjective truth.
→ The use of technology products implies objective truth.
→ Recognizing the absurdity of denying or neglecting the existence of truth implies absolute truth.
→ If you have a certainty, you know you belong to it.
→ If you're sure the world is uncertain, you know you don't belong to it.
→ Certainty belongs to awareness, it is full realization, a permanent state of truth, a definitive, absolute, non-changeable value.

→ Recognizing the absurdity of denying or neglecting the existence of truth implies absolute truth.

→ The phrase "No logic makes sense" falsifies itself, is absurd, negative self-referential, therefore there exists a valid logic.

→ The man taken by the world needs to detach himself from it to begin to see the truth.

→ Going deeper into the examination of the causes, the painful imbalances originate in the structure of the world and the body, therefore in the devil or in God.

→ To address me, in some situation you may need a moment of silence or solitude.

→ If I am benign and omnipotent, and I allow it, the malignity of the world implies your superiority to it, your divinity.
→ If I, God, love you and allow you to face such a difficulty, my correctness implies that you are immense, divine, similar to me.
→ Orienting, turning, voluntarily directing the mind, knowledge, attention towards God, towards the presence and point of view of God, implies realizing how much you have ignored and neglected God, and recognizing the emptiness of the world.

→ A time of recollection and solitude strengthens the mind and detaches you from the dust of nothingness.

→ When you practice conscious contact with me, you can see the enormous force that tries to distract you and subdue you.
→ The world seeks to obscure the higher reality of full truth and draws you towards its ever decomposable and temporary emptiness.
→ If you don't have the strength to seek and see what's always true, you can't have meaningful relationships.
→ Searching for any coherence within the total inconsistency is absurd, doomed to failure.
→ I only ask you to go through the world trusting me, loving me, yourself and others, trying not to increase anyone's pain.

→ The truth is eternal, the illusion is temporary.
→ The truth is eternal, unlimited, your essence, your root, your nature and your destiny.
→ Knowledge, thought is indestructible, it cannot be annihilated, it has to be eternal.
→ Only love, the knowledge of God overcomes the distance between the temporary world and the eternal world.
→ The temporary being needs an eternal being that precedes it, contains it and goes beyond it.

→ Those who live these certainties know that they belong to me, to the truth, and not to the world, in an indestructible bond of mutual love.
→ Only the certainty of eternal truth and his bond to it can enable man to overcome the burden of the world.
→ My certainty and truth, I know that you fully exist and I yearn for you and I belong beyond all illusions.
→ By seeking any form of greater coherence you can get to God, but before you get there you have certainly been inconsistent and probably a monster.

→ In this world you are destined to seek coherence starting from ambiguity.

→ In ogni suo aspetto l'essere di questo mondo implica un pensiero che lo precede, lo fa esistere, lo regola e lo oltrepassa.

Relative arguments