The more you know me, love me and trust me, the less you need to do something, rules or mental schemes to gain merit or despise others.
Above all love
A hidden inheritance
- of Francesco Arista and Antonella Molica
Argument
- → I don't order, I love.
- → I do not show myself to you in command, overpowering or illusory.
- → This is not a command or an order.
- → I do not command, do not order, announce and proclaim gently that I am love for you.
- → I am the Lord, knowledge without boundaries, I am not overpowering, I do not command, do not order and do not impose ideas.
- → I do not command, I do not order, I love.
- → Wanting to command means not loving.
- → I, the Lord, gently speak to you of my heart, of my reason for you all, I am a father, I do not impose, do not order and gently approach you.
- → My kingdom is certain, founded on the certainty, the love, the unity, the harmony, the peace, the understanding, the delicacy, it is gift of God father, the most high, given not with orders or commands, which starts from me, infinite, light and love.
- → If you don't lead it, your mind imposes on you the contents of the world, sooner or later painful.
- → In this world, material logic imposes itself on man before he is able to defend himself, but it is subjected to destruction, and this painful bond pushes man to seek beyond.
- → The human experience of pain is objectively inevitable in life in the world, because in it man must born, fall ill and die.
- → In addition, pain has a significant subjective factor, the difference between what you want and what happens, a difference on which man can gradually intervene.
- → If the main purpose of man is within the world, this titanic work is overbearing or passive, always a failure.
- → To win the world, man must have an end beyond the world, and adhere to that end until he considers the secondary world, devoid of true reality.
- → Then man knows God, himself and the world.
- → This path leads man to his real fullness, to minimize the world and any harmful conditioning.
Relative arguments